November 17, 2010

Newsea "Dream Glory" Retexture by Robodl95

Download at Look it's a Plumbob Over my Head

File name:
Robodl95_Newsea Dream Glory

Newsea version here - Mesh required

49 comments:

  1. So.. Newsea retexture marathon begins!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm so excited to see more retextures. I really need to learn this technique... I'd love to change some TSR hairs ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. (\___/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks to aWT I am now part of the 'marathon' :D

    http://shyneinnocence.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/newsea-dina-brighten-and-recontrol/

    ReplyDelete
  5. LOL Yep... Newsea hair is one complex mesh. Aw well... the price you pay... lol

    ReplyDelete
  6. I found it. The reason why my game lags like hell! I'm deleting all Newsea hairs <.<

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This hair has 12576 polys

    Probably robodl checked the mesh with the morphs

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. But 12000 is much more better than 62000 :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Good job! Mooaaar! :D

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yeah I'm very sorry about that! Thanks Tum for setting me straight :)

    I nearly fainted when I saw 62k XD

    ReplyDelete
  13. So, if we install this, we will have two versions of the same hair?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why do we have to download Newsea's mesh for this to work? If I wanted to deal with T$R I would just download the original.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Why do we have to download Newsea's mesh for this to work? If I wanted to deal with T$R I would just download the original."

    Because they're hoping that this way, TSR won't attack them for it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thanks a lot, it looks much better!

    ReplyDelete
  17. So I heard TSR gives you virus to your downloaded files that messes up with your sims if you share their files that happen to have tracker (even if you delete the shared files at once when finding out that was wrong)

    and even if you continue just using the files for your own game only they still do that to you. is this REALLY true O_O

    ReplyDelete
  18. is it christmas already? :)

    ReplyDelete
  19. ^^
    very true. so it doesn't surprise me that the people retexturing aren't getting cocky by sharing a link to the original mesh.

    ReplyDelete
  20. "even if you delete the shared files at once when finding out that was wrong"

    Darling, T$R are the ones who are wrong. Never ever forget that.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Alright Thanks for telling me. I guess I better not go that site again.. scary

    ReplyDelete
  22. This is an historical day! :)

    ReplyDelete
  23. Sure hope that this system is long lived.

    Great idea!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Eeeewww... I need the original "donation-only" mesh to make this work? No thanks, I'm never dealing with T$® ever again.

    ReplyDelete
  25. ^ You dealt with them at all in the first place? That IS a shame.

    I think it's funny so many people are scared of retexturing their hairs (withOUT the original mesh) because they'll get in TROUBLE of some kind. TSR is doing serious illegal activity every day on a grand scale! There's no grounds whatsoever for them to have any right to give others a hard time for retextures.

    ReplyDelete
  26. ^^ Great points here. Yes, it's actually ***illegal*** what TSR is doing on multiple fronts. Honestly, it's just one of those situations where they figure 'if we can get enough people to believe it's wrong, then eventually it IS wrong'.

    In some ways, TSR is the biggest pirate of us all. Who cares what threaten others; they have no power to actually do anything whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  27. TSR allows TS2 retextures, they just don't want you including the mesh as that is considered sharing their files which is bad. No one has done this before because Newsea's hairs don't work with the normal texture replacing method, that's why aWT's method is so important (allows us to have Newsea hairs without the mesh)

    ReplyDelete
  28. I never understood these silly threats by T$R either, as they are meaningless.

    The proof is right in front of us. MATY has received multiple "threats" threatening legal action to remove all their T$R files off of their site... yet they have been giving these threats for YEARS and 'oddly' nothing has happened. Go figure! lol

    ReplyDelete
  29. If by "virus" you mean "tracker", then yes. If by "virus" you mean a "virus" that messes with your game.... no. I think that would have set EA in an uproar and be sued for spreading viruses via the Exchange :) Plus we'd have heard about it here. A million times a day. Every day.

    ReplyDelete
  30. "The proof is right in front of us. MATY has received multiple "threats" threatening legal action to remove all their T$R files off of their site... yet they have been giving these threats for YEARS and 'oddly' nothing has happened. Go figure! lol"

    Pescado runs his own server, which isn't based in the U.S. Most other sites depending on outside hosting services that will take them down if TSR complains. That's why GOS is now on Pescado's server, and why TSR was able to take them down (briefly) before he moved them over.

    So no, TSR's threats are not empty. What they do is morally bankrupt as hell.

    ReplyDelete
  31. "Pescado runs his own server, which isn't based in the U.S. Most other sites depending on outside hosting services that will take them down if TSR complains. That's why GOS is now on Pescado's server, and why TSR was able to take them down (briefly) before he moved them over.

    So no, TSR's threats are not empty. What they do is morally bankrupt as hell."

    Actually they are empty. GOS happened to be hosted on GoDaddy which in notorious for taking down sites if someone so happens to sneeze incorrectly at them. Secondly the only reason GoDaddy listened to TSR was because they claimed GOS was infringing on their copyright. Which technically until they can prove they have registered that any item hosted on their site is under their copyright their arguments hold no water. Remember, claiming copyright and actually having copyrights are two totally different animals.

    Anyways, looks lovely Robodl! It's sad that it does require the mesh considering on blocky newsea's meshes are to begin with.

    ReplyDelete
  32. While I applaud creators actually offering Newsea retextures (finally), I must say that this looks like an EA texture and not relevant to my interests.
    But I'm glad I have a choice! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  33. "While I applaud creators actually offering Newsea retextures (finally), I must say that this looks like an EA texture and not relevant to my interests.
    But I'm glad I have a choice! Thank you!"

    Haha... yeah... anyone using Pooklet textures sucks, save Anubis XD

    ReplyDelete
  34. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  35. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  36. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  37. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  38. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  39. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  40. What I don't like about robodl textures is that they look so dull looking that his textures would be better if he retextured EA hairs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  41. wow, I thought the message wasn't sent, and then I pressed the button so many times and it was sent too many times. sory about that!

    ReplyDelete
  42. wow, I thought the message wasn't sent, and then I pressed the button so many times and it was sent too many times. sory about that!

    ReplyDelete